Talk:Scooby-Doo! and the Monster of Mexico

Animation Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't see why this article should be speedy deleted. The movie is notable enough to appear on a template. --Gray Porpoise 22:57, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

There was a copyvio though I have deleted that portion (along with the speedy tag).Mallanox 23:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

criticizim-idiots think he's "Mexico's Bigfoot"

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

should we add a section talking about how the idiots who made the movie mistaked Chupacabra is Mexico's Bigfoot whean he's lookes,acts,or does any of the crap bigfoot does(for exaple, hes not like,15ft. tall, hes about 3-6ft. tall) and how horrible these people reserched. --Sonicobbsessed-The Self-Proclamed Ultamate Sonic Fan 05:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, maybe the comment of his origin being mistaken in the movie can be moved there too. -Dark Dragon Flame 22:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

To me, when I first watched the movie, the whole idea of it being a Sasquatch, was both incorrect and unexciting. I hate that movie. Anyways, we should expand the section with the facts about the wrong info, and change the "correct reptiliant creature" to something like traditional or somehting, because Canine-like images are becoming more popular, and there isnt really a "correct" idea. Yes, I know this conversation is over a year old but bear with me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.224.25.70 (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic