Talk:Sarcastaball

Animation: American / Television / Computer / South Park Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group.
	This article is supported by the South Park task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Football League Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Animation / Television / Colorado

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.
	Colorado portal This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado. To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above. For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!

Untitled

Please do not add mention of pop cultural references, continuity notes, trivia, or who the targets of a given episode's parody are, without accompanying such material with an inline citation of a reliable, published, secondary source. Adding such material without such sources violates Wikipedia's policies pertaining to Verifiability, No Original Research, and Synthesis.

While a primary source (such as the episode itself, or a screencap or clip from it at South Park Studios) is acceptable for material that is merely descriptive, such as the synopsis, it is not enough to cite a primary source for material that constitutes analytic, evaluative or interpretative claims, such as cultural references in works of satire or parody, because in such cases, such claims are being made by the editor. This is called synthesis, which is a form of original research, and is not permitted on Wikipedia, regardless of whether one thinks the meaning of the reference is "obvious". Sources for such claims must be secondary sources in which reliable persons, such as TV critics or reviewers, explicitly mention the reference.

In addition, trivial information that is not salient or relevant enough to be incorporated into the major sections of an article should not be included, per WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE and WP:TRIVIA, and this includes the plot summary. As indicated by WP:TVPLOT, the plot summary is an overview of a work's main events, so avoid any minutiae that is not needed for a reader's understanding of the story's three fundamental elements: plot, characterization and theme. This includes such minutiae as scene-by-scene breakdowns, technical information or detailed explanations of individual gags or lines of dialogue.

If you're new to Wikipedia, please click on the wikilinked policy pages above to familiarize yourself with this site's policies and guidelines.

IGN Review is "wrong" due to being out-of-context

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The comments pulled from IGN are from a Sarcastic paragraph and taken out-of-context in this wiki. Here is the full paragraph:

And how about Butters' Creamy Goo? That recurring joke was sooooo hysterical. I literally couldn't stop laughing, that's how funny I thought it was. I could hardly catch my breath. Matt Stone and Trey Parker deserve a round of applause -- check that -- two rounds of applause for discovering the key to comedy. What an original and delightful commentary -- such a breath of fresh air! Notice the use of "check that" as a tell tale that the reviewer really wasn't being serious here by referencing the SP Jim Rome joke. And the second paragraph begins: Okay, in all seriousness... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.171.247.91 (talk) 23:06, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I know I'm really late here, but LOL. The review clearly uses heavy sarcasm (which is the running joke in the entire episode), yet it's referenced here as genuine praise. I tried to change it accordingly, so I hope it's better! Spitsonpuppies (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

No points taken off for lateness, Spits, since there's no time limit on Wikipedia. Thanks for catching my error (I missed the "Sooooooooo" in Nicholson's review, denoting the sarcasm), and improving the article. :-) Nightscream (talk) 03:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

CTE

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this episode really has nothing to do with replacement officials, it is far more related to the 'concussion crisis' stemming from the large number of nfl players being diagnosed with cte, yet the article completely fails to mention this.

this article (at least the "this episode references" part) needs to be rewritten.

overwhelming evidence from google

evidence from southpark fandom wiki Snarevox (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Putting aside the fact that Google search merely list clips of the episode itself, or links to IMDB, and the fact that both IMDB and fan wikis are not considered reliable sources per WP:USERG (or for the matter, the fact that the only mentions of concussions on the wiki cites a page on South Park studios that appears to be dead), the article indeed mentions the concussion matter in the Lead section. Nightscream (talk) 18:02, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic