This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The following sentence occurs: "Divine Liturgy is celebrated according to the Byzantine-Ukrainian rite, while the church is in full communion with the Pope." What does the word 'while' really mean? 'as long as' (implying that the Roman church might fall out of full communion?)? 'although' (implying that there is something wrong with the Byzantine-Ukranian rite?) 'because'? But that doesn't seem to work either. Could they not celebrate according to the Roman rite, and still be in full communion? I think that the whole thought needs to be expanded in order to fully state what is meant. An encyclopedia should not leave it up to the reader to have to interpret what the writer is trying to say. --Vicedomino (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The assertion that this church was made a minor basilica in 1998 is commonly made, but I can't find any source for it and the Diocese of Rome does not include the church on its list of minor basilicas. Could we have a reference, please, or deletion of the assertion? Basilwatkinsosb (talk) 16:42, 1 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
