Talk:San Vicente del Raspeig / Sant Vicent del Raspeig
(Redirected from Talk:San Vicente del Raspeig)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Kwamikagami in topic Move?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move?
edit- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved — kwami (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
San Vicente del Raspeig → San Vicente del Raspeig/Sant Vicent del Raspeig — I've merged the page histories of two articles, San Vicente del Raspeig and San Vicente del Raspeig/Sant Vicent del Raspeig. Which should be the permanent name? — kwami (talk) 04:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Seen there is not an English exonym, we can keep both official names (San Vicente del Raspeig/Sant Vicent del Raspeig) to avoid exclusions, and linguicism. Dual naming can certainly be used at Wikipedia; i.e. Biel/Bienne, Villajoyosa/La Vila Joiosa, Vitoria-Gasteiz. Jɑυмe (xarrades) 19:29, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request --Davidpar (talk) 19:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request The name is not San Vicente.--Galazan (talk) 19:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request --Lluis tgn (talk) 21:55, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request--the Dúnadan 23:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request --Catalaalatac (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request Official name is not San Vicente del Raspeig; but dual with a slash, San Vicente del Raspeig/Sant Vicent del Raspeig. Jɑυмe (xarrades) 01:26, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request --Judesba (talk) 01:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- I support this request --Mgclape (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Closed as unanimous. I'm taking this off my watch list, so let me know if there are any complications. — kwami (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.