Talk:Salzman
(Redirected from Talk:Salzmann)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by EchidnaLives in topic Requested move 23 November 2022
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Salzman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 23 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Salzmann to Salzman. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 23 November 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. If anyone wants to pursue a split, check out WP:PROPSPLIT. Thanks. (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Salzmann → Salzman – The page features many more Salzmans than Salzmanns. Thank you. NotReallySoroka (talk) 07:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:41, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- Split. These are distinct surnames that should not share a dabpage. 162 etc. (talk) 17:42, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per ngram: [1] - I don't see the value of a split at this point, they're variants of the same name, and turning one stubby list into three stubby lists isn't going to really be helpful. — Amakuru (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Anthroponymy has been notified of this discussion. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Support - they are different spellings of the same name: [2]. SilkTork (talk) 09:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.