Talk:Salman Aristo/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Grapple X in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
    Grand for the most part. However, short films should be italicised rather than quoted (borne out by WP:'', which is just a wonderful shortcut). I also think that filmography is brief enough that it could be tabled, feel free to disagree though.
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
    Good enough; some more personal rather than professional info might be useful but I understand that it can be hard to come by.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    N/A; might not be the worst idea to throw in something a bit more loosely connected like File:Andrea Hirata.jpg or even File:Brownies with chocolate chunks.jpg just to break up the text there.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Not a lot to be done, I'm sure you'll be fine to deal with it. On hold for now. Sorry you had to wait so long for this, you should have told everyone there was brownies involved. GRAPPLE X 21:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply