Comment

edit

It's a good article but does anyone know where the hell I can find a CD copy of Surf Nicaragua? It's not on iTunes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stelios Bedrock (talkcontribs)

I have all their discography, if you want I could give to you--Marco jm/Marcojm
Note please do not discuss illegal music sharing here. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:23, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I know this is over a year old but 1. I see nothing mentioning illegal music sharing. 2. Don't fucking whine. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 15:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Sacredreich.jpg

edit
 

Image:Sacredreich.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 10:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

edit

Alive at the Dynamo into Sacred Reich

Alive at the Dynamo doesn't seem to meet the guidelines at WP:NALBUMS: All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

Albums

An album requires its own notability, and that notability is not inherited and requires independent evidence. That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article. Conversely, an album does not need to be by a notable artist to require a standalone article if it meets the general notability guideline. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting.

I have added the one review I could find. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 22:00, 27 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Redirected here, Boleyn (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Inclusion regarding lineup changes during formation

edit

Several sources[1][2][3] detail the changes in the band's early lineup in 1985, but I'm not sure whether or not it should be included in the article or not per WP:ONUS. I'm unsure if adding information regarding the lineup changes would improve the article. If anyone can provide a second opinion, it would be appreciated.

  1. ^ Sharpe-Young, Garry (2007). Metal: The Definitive Guide : Heavy, NWOBH, Progressive, Thrash, Death, Black, Gothic, Doom, Nu. Jawbone Press. p. 138. ISBN 978-1-906002-01-5. OL 8776949M.
  2. ^ a b Larkin, Colin (1 June 1995). The Guinness Who's Who of Heavy Metal (2nd ed.). Guinness Publishing. p. 307. ISBN 978-0851126562. OL 9506976M.
  3. ^ Masley, Ed. "'This is magical': Beloved Phoenix metal band returns with their first album in 23 years". The Arizona Republic. Retrieved 2024-12-07.
Cite error: A list-defined reference with the name ":0" has been invoked, but is not defined in the <references> tag (see the help page).

Sparkle and Fade talkedits 21:59, 7 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Already done by requester. —Sparkle and Fade talkedits 08:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)Reply