Talk:Sabine Hossenfelder
Latest comment: 10 months ago by Jaredjeya in topic “Public engagement and scientific achievements” - misnamed?
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
14 June 2018 06:14
editThousands of physicists not in wikipedia have better citation records than http://inspirehep.net/author/profile/S.Hossenfelder.1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigt088 (talk • contribs) 06:14, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- This has already been discussed and it was decided unanimously to keep the article and that there were enough citations.[[1]] Bigt088- why are you setting up a single-purpose account for this? Volunteer1234 (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- I would personally like to see some references to her work on 'superdeterminism', and so include mentions of her associated academic paper and online articles. The reason for picking on this particular subject is that she's one of the few physicists to openly support it. It's a valid theory with untapped (in academia) consequences. TonyP (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- Superdeterminism mentions her. Perhaps that's better for quoting from her work (https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462, https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.01324)? There's much discussion of Hossenfelder and her papers on Talk:Superdeterminism already. ACaseOfWednesdays (talk) 05:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I would personally like to see some references to her work on 'superdeterminism', and so include mentions of her associated academic paper and online articles. The reason for picking on this particular subject is that she's one of the few physicists to openly support it. It's a valid theory with untapped (in academia) consequences. TonyP (talk) 13:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia wants to avoid another Donna Strickland fiasco. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.23.190.23 (talk) 03:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Is there a big risk of that in this case? 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:581B:F7D5:BA34:7B2D (talk) 13:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Picture
editIs that really the worst picture of her you could find? WithGLEE (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- It seems that she was the one who uploaded the photo to Wikimedia, so if you think it's unflattering then you should refer to her. :) Gbear605 (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:08, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
“Public engagement and scientific achievements” - misnamed?
editThis section doesn’t mention any scientific achievements and there’s also a section named “Research”. It’s confusing to the reader (I went there first instead of Research) and it’s also just two unrelated topics jammed together. Should it be renamed “Public Engagement”? Or “Public engagement and science outreach”? Jaredjeya (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)