Talk:SS Minnesotan

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SS Minnesotan/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be doing the GA review for this article, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 17:09, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • In the "Interwar years" section, you say "while the load of copper was reportedly the largest water shipment of Arizona copper to that time." Should this be "at that time"?
     • That's the same sense, but "at the time" suggests there it was the largest of a concurrent group, but not necessarily the largest ever. The source indicated that it was the largest ever (as of the date of the source), and I think "to that time" conveys that a little better. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
   • In the "World War II" section, you say "Minnesotan had some undisclosed problem". It might be me, but this wording sounds a little odd. Perhaps something along the lines of "Minnesotan developed an undisclosed problem"?
     • I like your proposed wording and have implemented it. — Bellhalla (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another very nice article. There are a couple of very minor prose issues, but despite these, I am passing the article to GA status. The two prose items are nitpicky things, which you can fix if you have the wish, time and energy :) Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 17:22, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SS Minnesotan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081008154823/http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/1major/inactive/bethsparrowspoint.htm to http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/shipyards/1major/inactive/bethsparrowspoint.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SS Minnesotan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005070516/http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h42000/h42572c.htm to http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h42000/h42572c.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Sponsor

The article has the ship's sponsor as "Lubelle Shepard", citing Christian Science Monitor of 27 Jan 1913 in an article "Hawaiian Ship Launched" (not found online). As it was the sistership Montanan that was launched the day previous it would be surprising if the CSM report did not cover that event, rather than the launch of Minnesotan over six months earier, unless the claim was that the young lady launched both ships. Miss Lubelle Shepard is indeed shown as sponsor of Montanan in its WP article, citing the same CSM reference, and that is supported by other contemporary reportage, eg Washington Post of 26 Jan 1913. According to the Baltimore Sun of 9 Jun 1912 the sponsor at the previous day's launching of Minnesotan had been Miss Doris Mary Hartridge, daughter of American-Hawaiian's construction superintendent. I have not made any changes as I am not able to access other contemporaneous references. Davidships (talk) 17:36, 10 June 2021 (UTC)