Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Fix the things I've noted in the text.

   I reworded the first and clarified the second. How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance:

   Publisher location needed for Tarrant

   Added. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Is another picture available?

   I haven't been able to find any other images of the ship; there's a somewhat bad linedrawing in the 1911 Brasseys (here) - that might be worth uploading and adding to the article. I did add a photo of the Black Prince to the Jutland section. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

   I like plan views for all of these early dreadnoughts so you can show what the odd turret arrangements looked like rather than relying only on a textual description. But it's your call, though I'd look for a better scan than that one.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: