This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hmmm......I often wonder whether sexism has something to do with the fact that Marcus extraordinary work is so throughougly minimized and she is largely undiscussed in the the halls of academic analytic philosophy. We all know that Kripke and other males did the REAL thinking after all. No??? (0; --Lacatosias15:00, 5 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
I don't know what you're on about (or were on about four years ago), you can't read any (decent) text on modal logic without mention of the Barcan formula. Careful with that axe, Eugene. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 02:17, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
lacatosias, a few points;
1. You presume gender is an issue for everyone within the halls of academe. It is not.
2. You presume Marcus' work was not marginal. I do not know. I found her while studying Computer Science.
3. You presume her (lack of) noteriety to be somehow bound to her gender. Highly improbable either way.
4. You have introduced bigotry into an academic article. Oh for shame!. You have victimized Marcus by way of your bigotry.
5. We are Men and Women, you know, People. Referring to people as 'males and females' is callous (rude) and pedantic.
6. NPOV.
7. 'extraordinary work', 'thoroughly minimized', 'largely undiscussed' ; all of this is rhetorical.
.jpg){kind=small}
