Talk:Russian ironclad Sevastopol

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Dank in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian ironclad Sevastopol/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 00:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Review

  • The toolbox checks out.
  • "an 32-gun": a 32-gun
  • "; four on the upper deck as chase guns and 28 on the lower deck.": sentence fragment; change the semicolon to a comma
  • "two gun": two guns
  • "her armament was changed again and now consisted of fourteen": "... changed again, to fourteen".
    • I didn't like the comma after again and went with: "In 1877, her armament was changed again to 14 eight-inch guns".
  • "that reduced": "reduced" isn't impossible in this sense, but it's a little uncomfortable. How about "that narrowed"?
  • "All dates used in this article are Old Style": period needed.
  • "Robert Gardiner": "Gardiner, Robert"
  • Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    - Dank (push to talk) 00:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

All done, thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 20:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply