Talk:Rudyard Kipling (ship)/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by White Shadows in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: ~NerdyScienceDude 00:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article shortly. ~NerdyScienceDude 00:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Any external links?.
- There are a few sites that I'll add in as external links in a bit. Thanks :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've added two so far....--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- The section heading for "External Links" needs the L decapitalized per WP:MOSHEAD. ~NerdyScienceDude 12:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've added two so far....--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:43, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- There are a few sites that I'll add in as external links in a bit. Thanks :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Any external links?.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- More citations could be used overall. For example, there are only two citations in the first section, and they are in the end.
- Technically everything is cited by those sources at the end of the paragraph. I'll try to see if I can add a few more in later today :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 10:15, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- More citations could be used overall. For example, there are only two citations in the first section, and they are in the end.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Stays on topic.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Looks pretty neutral to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit warring found.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Infobox image looks good.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- There are a few things that need to be done before this article is passed, but it should be pretty easy. ~NerdyScienceDude 02:06, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: