Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race season 1
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RuPaul's Drag Race season 1 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contestant table
editIn response to the editor who removed a column from a long-stable chart, with the edit-summary 'There's no point of having the real names on when more than half the casts' real names isn't on here,' I'd have to respond that there's indeed a point since these charts exist in other seasons' articles, filled to varying degrees; that three names are already there; and that it's only a matter of time before cited, footnoted names are added, as has been done already today for other seasons. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Notes for lightblue and pink
editI'm just gonna use this as a section for notes on each episode. This starts after Ru brings the queens back after judge deliberations. Lists in order the queens and their status.
Episode 1
editJade, Shannel, Bebe, Tammie step forward, are safe. Ongina is safe. Nina announced as winner. Rebecca negatively critiqued and announced as safe. Akashia and Porkchop announced in the bottom. Oath2order (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Episode 2
editOngina's group is safe, Ongina wins. Jade announced as safe. Bebe is safe. Akashia and Tammie are bottom 2. Oath2order (talk) 01:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Episode 3
editOngina and Nina positively critiqued and declared safe. Rebecca declared safe. Bebe called winner. Jade negatively critiqued. Akashia and Shannel bottom two. Oath2order (talk) 02:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Episode 4
editBebe and Nina positively critiqued and declared safe. Ongina announced as winner. Shannel both positively and negatively critiqued but is safe. Rebecca and Jade are bottom 2. Oath2order (talk) 02:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Episode 5
editShannel positively critiqued. Rebecca is winner. Nina is negatively critiqued. Bebe and Ongina bottom 2. Oath2order (talk) 02:20, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Episode 6
editShannel requests to quit. Deliberations. Bebe wins. Nina is positively critiqued and is safe. Rebecca and Shannel bottom 2. Oath2order (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Final table
editContestant | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BeBe Zahara Benet | SAFE | SAFE | WIN | HIGH | BTM2 | WIN | Winner | Guest |
Nina Flowers | WIN | HIGH | HIGH | HIGH | LOW | HIGH | Runner-Up | Miss C |
Rebecca Glasscock | LOW | HIGH | SAFE | BTM2 | WIN | BTM2 | Eliminated | Guest |
Shannel | SAFE | HIGH | BTM2 | LOW | HIGH | ELIM | Guest | |
Ongina | HIGH | WIN | HIGH | WIN | ELIM | Guest | ||
Jade | SAFE | SAFE | LOW | ELIM | Guest | |||
Akashia | BTM2 | BTM2 | ELIM | Guest | ||||
Tammie Brown | SAFE | ELIM | Guest | |||||
Victoria "Porkchop" Parker | ELIM | Guest |
- The contestant won RuPaul's Drag Race.
- The contestant was the runner-up of RuPaul's Drag Race.
- The contestant was eliminated in third place without lip-syncing.
- The contestant was voted Miss Congeniality by viewers.
- The contestant won a challenge.
- The contestant received positive critiques but was ultimately declared as "safe".
- The contestant received negative critiques but was ultimately declared as "safe".
- The contestant was in the bottom two.
- The contestant was eliminated.
- The contestant returned as a guest for the finale episode.
Uh can someone change the table? it's completely erased. Wtf? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Char1ene16 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
Intro sentence about fan vote
editSentence 5 in the first paragraph doesn't make sense. "One of the nine contestants to compete on RuPaul's Drag Race, Nina Flowers was determined by an audience vote via the show's official website." Determined for what? Needs context - I would edit it but I don't know what it's trying to say. 2601:2C6:4380:3860:B989:6F83:F980:3D06 (talk) 03:40, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
- Guessing it's talking about Miss Congeniality, but yeah, that sentence is a mess. Armadillopteryx 03:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)