Talk:Rozelle–Darling Harbour Goods Line

Did you know nomination

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the former Rozelle–Darling Harbour Goods Line features the largest brick railway viaduct in New South Wales?

• Source: 'The 28-span Jubilee Park Viaduct is significant as the longest section of brick arch viaduct on the NSW system.' https://www.hms.heritage.nsw.gov.au/App/Item/ViewItem?itemId=5045444

• Reviewed:
• Comment: Since opening this nomination, I have moved the page from Rozelle–Darling Harbour railway line to Rozelle–Darling Harbour Goods Line. The former title reflected general – but not mandatory – convention on articles for Australian railway lines, while the latter reflects the line's common name. As such, this nomination links to what is now a redirect, while the hook itself links to what is now the article's primary title. The article remains the same; it has simply been moved on relatively minor technical grounds. Will Thorpe (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Created by Willthorpe (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

Will Thorpe (talk) 15:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC).

• @Willthorpe: Redirects are not allowed on the main page and I'm not quite sure what your comment's trying to say, could you fix the link?--Launchballer 16:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Launchballer The subject of the nomination is the main page, not the redirect. The title of the article (Rozelle-Darling Harbour railway line) reflects Wikipedia convention on the naming of rail lines in Australia, while the hook and article body (Rozelle-Darling Harbour Goods Line) reflects its common name. Happy to amend if necessary. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 01:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

I’ve actually now requested the article be moved to its common name, which is what is used in the nomination. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 01:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

New enough, long enough, interesting, no copyright problems, hook cited on article, all good. The light is now green. JuniperChill (talk) 21:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

@Willthorpe and JuniperChill: iiiiii'm really not sure I'd agree that the hook is interesting? "Largest brick railway viaduct in New South Wales" doesn't seem to leave the reader wanting to know more. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I was also thinking about it being converted to a light rail line, but that has also occured in Manchester so i don't consider that interesting. In fact, many UK light rail/tram systems actually used part of a former railway line. I also couldn't find anything else in the article that I consider interesting. I have interests in railway related stuff. JuniperChill (talk) 09:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

So do I. Biased as I am, I think it's alright – 'largest in NSW' – it's certainly in a niche-ish area, but then so are most other DYKs more or less. Will Thorpe (talk) 15:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)