Talk:Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2006
Latest comment: 4 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2006 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 2, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 May 2006. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Romania in the Eurovision Song Contest 2006/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Going to review this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020 MWright96 (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
edit- "through the national selection Selecția Națională 2006" - it should be made more clearer that it was a national selection competition
- "Romania ultimately reached fourth place in the contest's Grand Final," - the date of the Grand Final of Eurovision 2006 is missing here
Selecția Națională 2006
edit- "a competition in order to select their entrant for the Eurovision Song Contest 2006." - the words "in order" are redundant in this sentence
- "was eventually disqualified from the contest due to having received television and radio airplay" - the text in bold should be written as due to the song for clarity and completeness
- "to 1 October 2005, TVR's cutoff date." - to TVR's cutoff date of 1 October 2005.
- "by Heaven were voluntarily withdrawn" - make it clear that the performers voluntarily withdrew their songs as stated in România Liberă
Indiggo controversy
edit- "In a late-night talk show following the winner's announcement," - the announcement of the winner,
- "they based the accusation on reports that their voting line was continuously busy and so people were unable to vote for them when they called." - , preventing people from voting for them when they called.
Promotion
edit- "Starting with 20 April 2006," - correct saying; should be on or from
At Eurovision
edit- "the show was aired on TVR," - broadcast is more formal
- "which yielded in various changes" - saw various changes
- "selected countries, except the host country" - try to not repeat the same word close together in the same sentence
- "qualified to the final due to their top 11 result the preceding year." - how about result in the 2005 contest. instead?
- "A reported €160,000 were" - was
Voting
edit- "Below is a breakdown of points awarded to Romania in the Grand Final, as well as by Romania in the semi-final" - try not to repeat the country's name in the same sentence
- "Romania finished in fourth position, being awarded a total of 172 points including 12 by Moldova and Spain, as well as ten by" - 172 points, including 12 by Moldova and Spain, and ten from Cyprus, Israel, Malta and Portugal.
- "For the Grand Final points announcement," - For the announcement of its points in the Grand Final,
References
edit- The spelling to EscToday in Reference 22 should be spelt as ESCToday for consistency
- Reference 25 is missing the date it was published
Will put the review on hold to give the nominator time to address/respond to the issues raised above. MWright96 (talk) 09:27, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MWright96: I have solved everything here too. Thank you, again, very much for your reviews. All the best; Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Cartoon network freak: Promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 06:47, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @MWright96: I have solved everything here too. Thank you, again, very much for your reviews. All the best; Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)