Talk:Robert of Bath

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert of Bath/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe (talk · contribs) 02:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Prose comments below
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    I checked some of the references and found no issues with verifiability or plagiarism.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    No images, presumably because none are available
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Just two minor comments below, otherwise it definitely meets the GA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • "He was the bishop that organized the archdeacons of the diocese on a territorial basis." does that mean he reorganized the archdeacons to operate on a territorial basis? If so, this could be more clear
  • "Robert also built at Bath" what does this mean?

(t · c) buidhe 03:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply