![]() | A fact from Robert Wilson (tenor) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Broadway 1942 and 1943
editIBDB says that Wilson was on Broadway (other than with D'Oyly Carte) in 1942 and 1943. Is that the same guy? I rather think not. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:55, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree. The parts are small and wouldn't have attracted an artist of his experience and reputation at that point in his career. The 1930s credits are undoubtedly his, put the 1942-1943 performances were most likely another performer with the same name.4meter4 (talk) 05:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Infobox
editThe Manual of Style says: "Whether to include an infobox ... is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." While sports and politician bios can benefit from infoboxes, most articles in liberal arts fields, as here, do not. See arbitration report: "Infoboxes may be particularly unsuited to liberal arts fields when they repeat information already available in the lead section of the article, are misleading or oversimplify the topic for the reader". I disagree with including an infobox in this article because: (1) The box would emphasize unimportant factoids stripped of context and lacking nuance, in competition with the WP:LEAD section, which emphasizes and contextualizes the most important facts. (2) Since the most important points in the article are already discussed in the Lead, or adequately discussed in the body of the article, the box would be redundant. (3) It would take up valuable space at the top of the article and hamper the layout and impact of the Lead. (4) Frequent errors creep into infoboxes, as updates are made to the articles but not reflected in the redundant info in the box, and they tend to draw vandalism, fancruft and repeated arguments among editors about what to include. (5) The infobox template creates a block of code at the top of the edit screen that discourages new editors from editing the article. (6) It would discourage readers from reading the text of the article. (7) IBs distract editors from focusing on the content of the article. Instead of improving the article, they spend time working on this repetitive feature and its coding and formatting. See also WP:DISINFOBOX.
In addition, this article concerns a performer famous for his work in Gilbert and Sullivan operas. Throughout the articles within the scope of WikiProject G&S, the consensus has been not to have infoboxes, so adding an infobox would degrade the consistency of design throughout these articles. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:01, 12 May 2021 (UTC)