This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
This page is within the scope of the UC Davis task force. New members are always welcome!
This page is within the scope of the UC San Diego task force. New members are always welcome!
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to COVID-19, broadly construed, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Do not feed the trolls! This article or its talk page has experienced trolling. The subject may be controversial or otherwise objectionable, but it is important to keep discussion on a high level. Do not get bogged down in endless debates that don't lead anywhere.
Know when to deny recognition and refer to WP:PSCI, WP:FALSEBALANCE, WP:WIKIVOICE, or relevant notice-boards. Legal threats and trolling are never allowed!
Latest comment: 3 days ago13 comments10 people in discussion
In the opening paragraph several sources are quoted and their claims
(now known to be false) are presented as facts: "During the COVID-19 pandemic, Malone promoted misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines." His information was in fact accurate, he is in fact one of the inventors of the mRNA vaccine technology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JanBielawski (talk • contribs) 15:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Dr. Malone did NOT spread false information during COVID. Those who say otherwise are the ones spreading disinformation. See the documentary film, "Thank You, Dr. Fauci", available on different platforms, if you care to know the truth. Wikipedia is not a credible source for truth. 50.102.198.252 (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's precisely the problem. What truth is based on. For Wikipedia, presenting as truth, what is based on what they call "reliable sources", is the chosen option. It works well as long the so called "reliable sources" haven't engaged into a propaganda war against even common sense. As a result, mechanically, that propaganda is landing into Wikipedia.
Making Wikipedia admins to consider that it can be problematic is pretty difficult, even impossible. Because they see as source of truth what they call reliable (falling on the initial bias mentioned), and not as a source of propaganda, indeed. So it falls on deaf ears.
But now it has become so rotten with that, not only for Dr. Malone. All of those who haven't complied with "The ministry of Truth" are labelled "conspiracy theorist", and it stays, even if what they said was indeed true, as we know now.
So let's make things clear, once for all: Wikipedia is not an Encyclopedia, but a political propaganda tool, where the most conformist editing participants are promoted admins, so that they can block anyone not sharing their vue. The result is that disaster. 2A0D:3344:23E3:7A10:E21B:8CF2:8ED3:29A6 (talk) 09:08, 28 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "Malone promoted misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines." to "Malone was accused of promoting misinformation about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines."
As no-one can perfectly arbitrate what is misinformation and what is not it's disingenuous to say definitively that he promoted misinformation as we can't know for sure what is misinformation and what is not. Doogiej7 (talk) 10:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well yes we can, as a lie is a lie, did the Pfizer–BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines worsen COVID-19 infections? Was the Chairman of the Thomson Reuters Foundation was a board member at Pfizer? Slatersteven (talk) 10:26, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
This article is biased trash controlled by the same usual wikipedia power users
Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A phrase such as "promoted misinformation" is completely unencyclopedic, and there is an established routine of maintaining such terms on wikipedia by power users such as Slatersteven, through endless reverting of edits. Many comments on this talk page have been reverted by power users, making it seem like there is less dissent to this practice. These are nebulous, in vogue terms, intended to savage a reputation. You ought to use a neutral tone, and this is not a neutral tone. Countlessly many comments mention that this language is inappropriate, yet it endures somehow due to power-users endlessly reverting edits on the article due to the padlock it, which is to prevent...vandalism? The power-users are in fact behaving as vandals. 60.240.156.235 (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I just t all respect for this forum. To see that writers labeled Dr Malone’s info as misinformation is horrendous. With all we know now and the health implications of the COVID vaxx - surely they could reference studies that verify what Dr Malone has reported. Come on now - he developed the MRNA methodology. To those who choose to follow the lies - you are free to do so. But my money is on the truth. And the truth will never be a threat to me. 2601:5C8:C201:EDC0:A0E2:1F5F:DBBD:3A25 (talk) 02:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
