Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Indy beetle in topic GA Review

Potential sources

edit

-Indy beetle (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

This is really nice work Indy beetle. You handled the conflicting and incomplete sources well. It's an important article in an area where Wikipedia's coverage could stand to be a lot better. My only suggestion would be this sentence: His father died when he was two years old, and one of his siblings also died. It just feels too dry - maybe something like "and one of his siblings died before adulthood". But that's far too minor an issue to stop promotion. Guettarda (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Guettarda: Thank you for the review. I have implemented the recommended change. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Reply