Talk:Rob Mitchell (Victorian politician)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Mkativerata in topic Move?
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Rob Mitchell (Victorian politician) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Move?
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. A number of alternatives have been proposed, but the current title appears to have the most support and there is little demonstrable risk of ambiguity. Mkativerata (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Rob Mitchell (Victorian politician) → ? — Relisted. Rob Mitchell (Australian Labor politician)??? Vegaswikian (talk) 01:34, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
- "Victorian" is ambiguous: here in Britain "Victorian" usually means "living in Britain in the time of Queen Victoria". Anthony Appleyard (talk) 08:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- I don't really think there is an alternative. As already established, it can't go to Rob Mitchell (Australian politician) because there is also a Queensland politician of the same name (who doesn't yet have an article). "Victorian" has been used before (as in Tony Smith (Victorian politician)), and the possibility of confusion is surely very slight. Frickeg (talk) 08:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- I thought the convention was to describe federal politicians as Australian in cases where there has been only one at the national level. e.g. Peter Walsh (Australian politician). Sanananda (talk) 09:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Not knowing anything about the Queensland politician, would it be possible to use the disambiguation "(Australian Labor Party politician)" 84.92.117.93 (talk) 10:20, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- The Queensland politician was a National, so that is an option. "(Australian Labor politician)" is probably adequate, though (this has been used on Bob Brown (Australian Labor politician), who could just as easily be at "(New South Wales politician)", on reflection). Frickeg (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Unless there was a politician named Rob Mitchell during the British Victorian era, I don't see the problem. Powers T 11:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Same here. In every case such as this, we break it down by state - it makes it a lot less confusing, and a lot less of a mess. If there was a notable politician in Victorian England by the name of Rob Mitchell that he could be confused with, then there might be a point - otherwise, ignorance of geography is not an argument. Rebecca (talk) 15:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
- The Robert Mitchell dab page seems to have 3 similarly named politicians that arguably overlap the Victorian era, so "(Australian Labor politician)" (or the longer version) seems like a good idea. 76.121.3.85 (talk) 06:34, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, none of them do. Two are Americans and the other was active in the 1920s. Frickeg (talk) 06:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- the only reason that a move would be necessary would be if there was a politician from the Victorian era called Rob Mitchell with an article. There isn't so there is no actual ambiguity. Disambiguation is designed to allow readers to find the appropriate article, not provide additional information on the topic. Use of the term "Victorian" allows the reader looking for this specific article to find it. Besides, do we ever really use the term "Victorian" meaning the era as a disambiguation term anyway. -- Mattinbgn (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
- "Australian Labor (Party) politician" sounds good to me, but if the state were to be used, perhaps "Victoria politician" to avoid the ambiguity? (Although I agree the ambiguity is not a huge problem anyway.) --Kotniski (talk) 11:29, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.