This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
The article on River Derwent, Derbyshire is supported by the Derbyshire WikiProject, which is a collaborative effort to improve the quality and coverage of Derbyshire-related articles on Wikipedia.DerbyshireWikipedia:WikiProject DerbyshireTemplate:WikiProject DerbyshireDerbyshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
There are two different figures for the length of the river in this article. The main text says 66 miles, while the Infobox says 50 miles. Which one is correct? --Drgkl (talk) 14:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The explanation for some of this is Here but the bottom line says it all. Looking at the maps shows that they have included mill streams as well. Thought I would raise it here first, rather than simply change it. Jokulhlaup (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The article infers that Arkwright's Cromford Mill was powered by the Derwent. Whilst it may be in the Derwent Valley I understand that it used the Bonsall Brook/Cromford Sough for power. Jokulhlaup (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on River Derwent, Derbyshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
It is easy however to make one, which I am quite happy to do. I am unsure what exactly you want. From the description it implies- two non-navigable exits- one watered and a second in a tunnel. Is this correct?. In the meantime, just put the bifurcation below the dam icon. ClemRutter (talk) 08:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Drgkl and Jokulhlaup had a conversation a few years ago about the correct figure for the length of this river. The figure presented now is cited back to the Peak District National Park Authority, a responsible body but we don't know where they found the figure and can put no faith in it, as with so many UK river figures. Well, I too looked at the figure of 50 miles (80 km) currently given and, as with numerous other watercourses where dubious lengths have been asserted, I assiduously measured its length on online 1:25,000 scale OS mapping using a digital tool (wheresthepath) and determined it at 110.9 kilometres (68.9 mi). I'd be confident of the accuracy of the figure to within 1% - but with caveats: I began with the furthest reach of the longest headwater stream at Swains Moss at SK 1299 9667 and headed on down, taking a smoothed centre-line through the succession of reservoirs. It's a mostly straightforward if slow process of measuring stretch by stretch but becomes more troublesome downstream of Derby where three or four alternative route choices can be made as meander loops have been cut through and both old and new lines are labelled as 'River Derwent'. Taking the longer line in each case provides the figure I give. Take each of the shorter routes and you shave 4.2km off the total, giving 106.7km - some subjectivity can creep in around this.
As I've said elsewhere, this is of course original research on my part so cannot be included in the article but it does at least give an idea of what a true figure should look like if and when an editor finds a suitable reference out there! B.t.w. in this context, the links helpfully provided by Jokulhlaup no longer work - are there new links you're aware of? cheers Geopersona (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
