Talk:Rio Vista Dam

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Dams Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rio Vista Park was stole away from the owners by the state of texas

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The park now public was owned by a group of private owners. In the late 60’s it was taken from them by the state. The grounds of the park where clean and there was no graffiti on the walls. It was a peaceful park where one could go and relax and take a break from the world. The waterfall was part of a mill that was at one end of the dam. There was a board in the middle of the dam that would regulate the flow of water. From the Dam one could catch different types of fish and a rare type of crayfish that only lived in the river. A crayfish that had been caught had been recorded weighing close to a one pound. There were fresh water eels and other types of animals.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Robert zingery (talk • contribs) 22:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No. Wrong park.

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Rio Vista Park is not the same place complained of as having been taken. The comment should refer to the spring lake, the source of the San Marcos River, formerly within the amusement business known as Aquarena Springs. The "dam" referred to is at one of the outflows of that lake at the site of an old mill and ice house that has become a series of restaurants. The old Aquarena Springs is now held by Texas State University. In the days when it was a business, it was closely guarded, day and night, by the owners trespassing vigorously discouraged by several means, including occasional gunfire.

Rio Vista Park is a distinctly different location far down stream from the source. The area is operated as a city park. As a navigable river in Texas, the San Marcos is free to use below the source. (Free use does not imply free access. Banks may be used for necessary navigation purposes, such as portage, but private land cannot be crossed for access without permission.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeltz the Poet (talk • contribs) 22:59, 7 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please disregard the "No. Wrong Park" comments. Thank you. (Jeltz the Poet (talk) 15:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC))Reply

Add topic