Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive index


Report generated based on a request from Talk:Ring (mathematics). It matches the following masks: Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive <#>, Talk:Ring (mathematics).
This page was last edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) 11 months ago. (Update timer)

Discussion Topic Replies (estimated) Archive Link
Possible Definition Contradiction 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Possible Definition Contradiction
Definition of ring and unit elements 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition of ring and unit elements
Striving for conventions 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Striving for conventions
Definition: some references, remove unit element? 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition: some references, remove unit element?
Article is FULL of errors 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Article is FULL of errors
Some examples are not really examples 9 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Some examples are not really examples
The new definition of a subring. 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#The new definition of a subring.
A solid reason (I think) to reject requiring unity 16 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#A solid reason (I think) to reject requiring unity
Name 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Name
Assessment comment 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Assessment comment
Multiply by zero 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Multiply by zero
Alternate definition, or different object altogether? 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Alternate definition, or different object altogether?
Options for poll on unit requirement 10 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Options for poll on unit requirement
Table of publications 6 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Table of publications
Proposed language for poll on unit requirement for rings 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Proposed language for poll on unit requirement for rings
Poll on unit requirement 22 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Poll on unit requirement
Definition not precise? 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition not precise?
Question: Center of the ring of all square n-by-n matrices with entries from R 5 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Question: Center of the ring of all square n-by-n matrices with entries from R
another small suggestion 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#another small suggestion
Improvements 9 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Improvements
Informal review 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Informal review
Copied text that may be added later 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Copied text that may be added later
Needs motivation for concepts 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Needs motivation for concepts
Improvements necessary 11 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Improvements necessary
Big changes 29 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Big changes
Outline 10 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Outline
Image of text? 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Image of text?
New section: some examples of the ubiquity of rings 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#New section: some examples of the ubiquity of rings
Is this article about "basic concepts in ring theory"? 16 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Is this article about "basic concepts in ring theory"?
Recent disputes 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent disputes
Concepts required 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Concepts required
GA Review 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#GA Review
Why "ring"? 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Why "ring"?
Out of place sentence in "Notes on Definition" section 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Out of place sentence in "Notes on Definition" section
Recent recasting of this article 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent recasting of this article
Associativity and unit? 6 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Associativity and unit?
Article is not encyclopedic 15 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Article is not encyclopedic
Cut too deep 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Cut too deep
Etymology 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Etymology
Simplify Introduction 8 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Simplify Introduction
Recent changes 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent changes
Edit on 12:29, 31 March 2010 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Edit on 12:29, 31 March 2010
Wrong statement in article? 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Wrong statement in article?
Possible topics to add to article 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Possible topics to add to article
disagreement on definition 9 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#disagreement on definition
Could the start be made more readable for a non-mathmatician ? 10 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Could the start be made more readable for a non-mathmatician ?
Rewrites to the introduction 24 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewrites to the introduction
Figure in introduction 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Figure in introduction
New picture, new text 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#New picture, new text
Some impressions 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Some impressions
Why a "ring"? 5 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Why a "ring"?
Erroneous statement in Second example? 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Erroneous statement in Second example?
The presentation of polynomial and matrix rings 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#The presentation of polynomial and matrix rings
Rewrites to the introduction (continued) 5 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewrites to the introduction (continued)
Rewriting of the entire article 20 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewriting of the entire article
Toward a shorter article 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Toward a shorter article
Rings? 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rings?
Zero a zero-divisor? 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Zero a zero-divisor?
"identity" vs. "identity element" 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#"identity" vs. "identity element"
Keeping the brakes on too much detail 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Keeping the brakes on too much detail
Yet Another Bad Introductory Paragraph to a Math Entry 5 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Yet Another Bad Introductory Paragraph to a Math Entry
merging ring theory into this article 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#merging ring theory into this article
Sorting out ring theory and ring (mathematics) 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Sorting out ring theory and ring (mathematics)
Proposed merge 27 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Proposed merge
Second example 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Second example
Polynomial ring 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Polynomial ring
Requiring a ring to have unity by definition 26 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Requiring a ring to have unity by definition
Requiring a ring to have unity by definition: follow-up 9 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Requiring a ring to have unity by definition: follow-up
Technical difficult with editing ring (mathematics) 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Technical difficult with editing ring (mathematics)
"Constructions" section too big 15 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#"Constructions" section too big
Non-empty 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Non-empty
Notation for matrix ring 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Notation for matrix ring
History section 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#History section
Ring (mathematics) 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Ring (mathematics)
Against usual 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Against usual
Does an ideal have to be defined as an additive subgroup? 4 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Does an ideal have to be defined as an additive subgroup?
Redundancy of ring axioms 12 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Redundancy of ring axioms
"Abelian groups" and "monoids" are too technical 7 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#"Abelian groups" and "monoids" are too technical
Would it be possible to make the introduction more readable, like the Mathworld one? 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Would it be possible to make the introduction more readable, like the Mathworld one?
This page needs specific examples of the relevance of rings in physics, for example. 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#This page needs specific examples of the relevance of rings in physics, for example.
Main image 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Main image
In §Definition, shouldn't the axiom of multiplicative identity exclude the 0 element? 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#In §Definition, shouldn't the axiom of multiplicative identity exclude the 0 element?
"Ring action" listed at Redirects for discussion 1 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#"Ring action" listed at Redirects for discussion
Undue weight? 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Undue weight?
Etymology of "ideal" 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Etymology of "ideal"
Terminology 3 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Terminology
Erroneous example 2 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Erroneous example
Rather unclear formulation implicitly including unitarity 10 Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Rather unclear formulation implicitly including unitarity

Start a discussion