Discussion Topic |
Replies (estimated) |
Archive Link
|
Possible Definition Contradiction |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Possible Definition Contradiction
|
Definition of ring and unit elements |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition of ring and unit elements
|
Striving for conventions |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Striving for conventions
|
Definition: some references, remove unit element? |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition: some references, remove unit element?
|
Article is FULL of errors |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Article is FULL of errors
|
Some examples are not really examples |
9 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Some examples are not really examples
|
The new definition of a subring. |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#The new definition of a subring.
|
A solid reason (I think) to reject requiring unity |
16 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#A solid reason (I think) to reject requiring unity
|
Name |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Name
|
Assessment comment |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Assessment comment
|
Multiply by zero |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Multiply by zero
|
Alternate definition, or different object altogether? |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Alternate definition, or different object altogether?
|
Options for poll on unit requirement |
10 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Options for poll on unit requirement
|
Table of publications |
6 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Table of publications
|
Proposed language for poll on unit requirement for rings |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Proposed language for poll on unit requirement for rings
|
Poll on unit requirement |
22 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Poll on unit requirement
|
Definition not precise? |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Definition not precise?
|
Question: Center of the ring of all square n-by-n matrices with entries from R |
5 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Question: Center of the ring of all square n-by-n matrices with entries from R
|
another small suggestion |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#another small suggestion
|
Improvements |
9 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Improvements
|
Informal review |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Informal review
|
Copied text that may be added later |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Copied text that may be added later
|
Needs motivation for concepts |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Needs motivation for concepts
|
Improvements necessary |
11 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Improvements necessary
|
Big changes |
29 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Big changes
|
Outline |
10 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Outline
|
Image of text? |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Image of text?
|
New section: some examples of the ubiquity of rings |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#New section: some examples of the ubiquity of rings
|
Is this article about "basic concepts in ring theory"? |
16 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Is this article about "basic concepts in ring theory"?
|
Recent disputes |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent disputes
|
Concepts required |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Concepts required
|
GA Review |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#GA Review
|
Why "ring"? |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Why "ring"?
|
Out of place sentence in "Notes on Definition" section |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Out of place sentence in "Notes on Definition" section
|
Recent recasting of this article |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent recasting of this article
|
Associativity and unit? |
6 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 1#Associativity and unit?
|
Article is not encyclopedic |
15 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Article is not encyclopedic
|
Cut too deep |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Cut too deep
|
Etymology |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Etymology
|
Simplify Introduction |
8 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Simplify Introduction
|
Recent changes |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Recent changes
|
Edit on 12:29, 31 March 2010 |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Edit on 12:29, 31 March 2010
|
Wrong statement in article? |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 2#Wrong statement in article?
|
Possible topics to add to article |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Possible topics to add to article
|
disagreement on definition |
9 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#disagreement on definition
|
Could the start be made more readable for a non-mathmatician ? |
10 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Could the start be made more readable for a non-mathmatician ?
|
Rewrites to the introduction |
24 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewrites to the introduction
|
Figure in introduction |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Figure in introduction
|
New picture, new text |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#New picture, new text
|
Some impressions |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Some impressions
|
Why a "ring"? |
5 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Why a "ring"?
|
Erroneous statement in Second example? |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Erroneous statement in Second example?
|
The presentation of polynomial and matrix rings |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#The presentation of polynomial and matrix rings
|
Rewrites to the introduction (continued) |
5 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewrites to the introduction (continued)
|
Rewriting of the entire article |
20 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rewriting of the entire article
|
Toward a shorter article |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Toward a shorter article
|
Rings? |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#Rings?
|
Zero a zero-divisor? |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Zero a zero-divisor?
|
"identity" vs. "identity element" |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 3#"identity" vs. "identity element"
|
Keeping the brakes on too much detail |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Keeping the brakes on too much detail
|
Yet Another Bad Introductory Paragraph to a Math Entry |
5 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Yet Another Bad Introductory Paragraph to a Math Entry
|
merging ring theory into this article |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#merging ring theory into this article
|
Sorting out ring theory and ring (mathematics) |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Sorting out ring theory and ring (mathematics)
|
Proposed merge |
27 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Proposed merge
|
Second example |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Second example
|
Polynomial ring |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Polynomial ring
|
Requiring a ring to have unity by definition |
26 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Requiring a ring to have unity by definition
|
Requiring a ring to have unity by definition: follow-up |
9 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Requiring a ring to have unity by definition: follow-up
|
Technical difficult with editing ring (mathematics) |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Technical difficult with editing ring (mathematics)
|
"Constructions" section too big |
15 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#"Constructions" section too big
|
Non-empty |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Non-empty
|
Notation for matrix ring |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Notation for matrix ring
|
History section |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#History section
|
Ring (mathematics) |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Ring (mathematics)
|
Against usual |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Against usual
|
Does an ideal have to be defined as an additive subgroup? |
4 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Does an ideal have to be defined as an additive subgroup?
|
Redundancy of ring axioms |
12 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Redundancy of ring axioms
|
"Abelian groups" and "monoids" are too technical |
7 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#"Abelian groups" and "monoids" are too technical
|
Would it be possible to make the introduction more readable, like the Mathworld one? |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Would it be possible to make the introduction more readable, like the Mathworld one?
|
This page needs specific examples of the relevance of rings in physics, for example. |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#This page needs specific examples of the relevance of rings in physics, for example.
|
Main image |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#Main image
|
In §Definition, shouldn't the axiom of multiplicative identity exclude the 0 element? |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)/Archive 4#In §Definition, shouldn't the axiom of multiplicative identity exclude the 0 element?
|
"Ring action" listed at Redirects for discussion |
1 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#"Ring action" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
Undue weight? |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Undue weight?
|
Etymology of "ideal" |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Etymology of "ideal"
|
Terminology |
3 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Terminology
|
Erroneous example |
2 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Erroneous example
|
Rather unclear formulation implicitly including unitarity |
10 |
Talk:Ring (mathematics)#Rather unclear formulation implicitly including unitarity
|