Talk:Richard H. Ebright/Archive 1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Shibbolethink in topic Total WP:OVERCITE
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Richard H. Ebright. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
.
Why are you people reverting edits? AniiiCo (talk) 12:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- yeah its such a pain when you spend time on it and its simply revert 103.49.54.130 (talk) 10:14, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Richard H. Ebright
Has Richard H. Ebright, the American Scientist, ever been a 'scout of the year'? 223.179.152.90 (talk) 09:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Total WP:OVERCITE
This is the most extreme example of WP:OVERCITE ive ever seen. Im not saying these refs are not useful, but do we really need multiple citations on every sentence, including one which has 11? Perhaps we can cut this down a bit? Bonewah (talk) 19:19, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, it's awful. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that is to be read by humans, not merely a repository of facts and references. Also, a devoted section to his views on COVID-19 is undue WP:RECENTISM. --Animalparty! (talk) 20:55, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm gonna go ahead and condense those citations into an endnote of some kind. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 15:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Okay I think I've mainly fixed the WP:OVERCITE problems, check my work and see what you think. — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 15:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Barton1234, See above discussion regarding WP:OVERCITE. The consensus here is to remove these many multiple redundant citations. What specifically do you have issues with? — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 11:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)