Talk:Richard Bland

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Jweaver28 in topic more work needed

{{u

For future reference

edit

http://blandheritage.org/GENEALOGY/database/html/dat19.htm#11 - Location (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Deadlink Allreet (talk) 22:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Bland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

{{u}Theroadislong}} Do you agree or don't you that the Ancestry and Family ties portion of this article is Family History and some of it is original research? If you agree then should it be scrubbed?Oldperson (talk) 22:03, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

more work needed

edit

I revised this extensively, although I had planned on starting a different article today. I haven't checked genealogy reference sources, but trimmed some about his birth family, and moved the rest of the genealogy near the end. I don't know whether a bigger pet peeve is genealogies without death dates or those without birth dates, but presume many of his children did not reach adulthood. However, listing those who married into the aristocracy or held office themselves is important, IMHO. For what it's worth, four men named Richard Bland served in the Virginia General Assembly in the colonial and early state era, the last in 1790. Also, R.T. Bland served in 1891-1892.Jweaver28 (talk) 23:48, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply