Talk:Rhode Island Route 4

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
Good articleRhode Island Route 4 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
October 25, 2009WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
November 24, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Rhode Island Route 4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Comments:

  1. "numbered state highway", two wikilinks should not be touching, I would suggest removing the link to Numbered routes in Rhode Island.
    1. Removed link
  2. Do not use "then" in describing progression of route in route description.
    1. Removed occurrence
  3. The sentence "After Exit 8, the mainline of the highway defaults onto Interstate 95 north, where Route 4 terminates" sounds awkward.
    1. After Exit 8, the mainline of the highway defaults onto Interstate 95 north. Route 4 terminates at the intersection with Interstate 95.
  4. The entire route description is sourced from Yahoo Maps. Can any other sources be added?
    1. I added a source from RIDOT to describe the Route 403 merge/Exit 7.
  5. Is the distance between Exit 5 and 6 1.5-metre (0.0015 km)? The exit list does not seem to indicate that.
    1. No, that was a typo in the convert template ("m" instead of "mi")
  6. Comma not needed in sentence "Construction began in 1983, and was completed five years later."
    1. Removed
  7. Shields should not be in the colspan notes denoting the beginning and end of the route.
    1. Removed
  8. "northbound exit and southbound entrance; mainline continues northbound as I-95" (last note in notes column): first "northbound" should be capitalized.
    1. Done

I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! Cheers, Raime 02:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I will pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 03:10, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply