Talk:Republic Airways

United States: Indiana / Indianapolis Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana - Indianapolis.

Aviation: Airlines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airline project.

Minnesota C‑class Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Embraer E-Jet family#E190|Embraer E190]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Split of article

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Any objection to splitting this into two articles? Vegaswikian 02:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Not here.. I'm going to wait the obligatory five days, then split them though.. —Cliffb 06:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Origin of Call Sign?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I am very curious about why the call sign of "Brickyard" for Republic Airlines. If anyone knows, could he/she add it to the article?--Mmpartee 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oops, never mind, I figured it out. It must come from the fact that they are HQ'd in Indianapolis. --Mmpartee 23:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

History of Republic Airlines

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The prior "history", showing that Republic Airlines started as Chautauqua in the 1970s, is simply wrong.

Chautauqua started in the 1970s, eventually was taken public as a holding company called Republic Airways Holdings (RAH) with one operating subsidiary, Chautauqua.

Later, RAH needed to create a new subsidiary -- Republic Airlines. Republic Airlines was a separate subsidiary from Chautauqua -- and was created from scratch. Nothing to do with Chautauqua, except that they were sibling subsidiaries.

Republic Airlines didn't exist prior to 2004. That's when it started. Not in the 1970s as Chautauqua.

They are completely separate subsidiaries, and indeed, completely separate "Part 121" certificates. In fact, the fact that they're separate companies with separate certificates is the whole reason Republic Airlines was created. It was created for the specific purpose of NOT being Chautauqua. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enplaned (talk • contribs) 04:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Other Republics?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I flew Republic Airlines, Los Angeles to Puerto Vallarta, in 1981 or '82.

I also flew on a Republic Airlines plane from a NYC airport to LA in 1993. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.223.153 (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

No More US Epxress

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

US Express doesn't exist as a brand any longer. If you can explain this well, feel free to update the lemma accordingly. 76.11.79.151 (talk) 08:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

United Passenger Drag-out

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I read somewhere that United flight 3411 is actually run by Republic Airline. Can somebody with more knowledge in the topic verify? I think it might be notable that, if this is the case, they are responsible for a 3% drop in the value of UAL stock. 50.59.88.46 (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm looking at that now, and don't want to put anything in the article until I'm sure.Yojimbo1941 (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic