Talk:Renault FT in Estonian service
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Kges1901 in topic Untitled
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Renault FT in Estonian service page were merged into Renault FT on 4 November 2016 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Untitled
editIs there really a point in having an article on the exported model, when it could just be added to the original article?
- It's comleatly pointles. Tehnicaly they didn't differ from other FT-17s and Estonyans didn't modyfay them either (not significantly atleast). Their use in Estonia should be described in some Estonian military history article.--Kyng (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
They should just delete this article. (Anonymous)
- Concur. No point to this article. MTWEmperor (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Trifler (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
- Concur. Kges1901 (talk) 09:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
this doesnt have much sense
editwhy there is a page about a renault ft of estonia? the only thing that they need is to add estonia to the users list and done, its the same than the original, and there is no reason to create a new page, even if it were a new variant, this is just non-sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.4.80.118 (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Done