Talk:Regulation and licensure in engineering

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SilkTork in topic Semi-protection


Semi-protection

edit
 

This article has been semi-protected. Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed. Such users can request edits to this article by proposing them on this talk page, using the {{Edit semi-protected}} template if necessary to gain attention. New users may also request the confirmed user right by visiting Requests for permissions. SilkTork ✔Tea time 15:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Lifting protection to see if it is still required. I have watchlisted this page; however, I am not always active on Wikipedia these days, so may not respond promptly to vandalism. Please restore protection if vandalism starts to occur again. SilkTork (talk) 23:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2022

edit

On the Registration and regulation section for Canada, it is missing 2 crucial requirements to become a professional engineer as listed on the PEO website, namely:

be at least 18 years old. be of good character.

In particular, the requirement of be of good character is paramount to a engineer as the professional engineer's duty is to be responsible for public safety and welfare.

Source: https://www.peo.on.ca/licence-applications/become-professional-engineer Pessoaesque (talk) 19:49, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit semi-protected}} template. In particular, be 18 and of "good character' is pretty standard for all professional licensing requirements for both the Anglosphere and Francosphere. The article does not actually list "requirements' however, but a process of registration. This makes it somewhat doubtful if these requirements, even if documentable, are worth mentioning. Finally, "be of good character" requirements rarely have little, if anything, to do with professional duties in practice. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 07:24, 19 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 11 July 2022

edit

On the United States Section, it is mentioned without citation that Texas and Florida were introducing licensing requirements for Software Engineering. According to the Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors, this appears to no longer be the case, as the NCEES has discontinued the PE for Software Engineers. Additionally, a potential source for the Florida claim may have been found:

Texas PELS: https://pels.texas.gov/software.html NCEES Discontinuing Software Engineer Exam: https://ncees.org/ncees-discontinuing-pe-software-engineering-exam/ NCEES Software Exam: https://ncees.org/engineering/pe/software/ FL Source: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0400-0499/0471/Sections/0471.031.html

  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Aaron Liu (talk) 13:12, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Legislative Intent

edit

Citation of Ontario Acts does not seem sufficient to claim worldwide custom and practice. Legal systems and status vary, and matters such as morals are far too varied to claim a general obligation. Chemical Engineer (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply