Talk:Ray Collins, Baron Collins of Highbury
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Orlady in topic Requested move
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move per proposal Orlady (talk) 04:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Ray Collins (trade unionist) → Ray Collins, Baron Collins of Highbury.
- Oppose - Better known as the general secreatry of the Labour Party and his Trade Union activities in general.--Lucy-marie (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This chap is no longer wholly or exclusively known by his pre-peerage nomenclature. Disambiguation necessary. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose in the strongest possible terms for consistency in naming per policy and guidelines like WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, WP:D and WP:PRECISION that apply to all Wikipedia article titles. The subject is most commonly known by the current title; adding peerage information is additional precision that is completely unnecessary, all good reasons to ignore WP:NCPEER. --Born2cycle (talk) 20:16, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support per WP:NCPEER. Disambiguation is needed, and using the title is the correct way to disambiguate per WP:NCPEER.
B2C's arguments are bogus, because the policy WP:TITLE explicitly permits topic-specific naming conventions such as WP:NCPEER. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC) - Support. Best way to disambiguate. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:26, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment - This is not the best way to disambiguate as he is far better known for his trade union activities.--Lucy-marie (talk) 17:39, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Disambiguation required, so best to use "another term or more complete name" as per WP:NCDAB. JRawle (Talk) 16:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.