Talk:Ranipuram

Untitled

A lot of POV Point of View in this article. Needs a complete rewrite to sort out fact from fiction.

"The Ranipuram forest should be declared as a wild life sanctuary by Kerala forest department to merge with borders of Thalakavery wild life sanctuary in Karnataka. The proposed Ranipuram Wildlife Sanctuary may protect and maintain overall biodiversity of the area in a better way."

"The proposed Ranipuram Wildlife sanctuary will be a boon to tourism development in Kasaragod district.

"it will be a big tourist attraction"

"The Ranipuram hill station which falls in Panathady reserve forest is an ideal area to convert a wild life sanctuary."

"The nearby reserve forest such as Kottanchery, eleri and malom can be club with each other to have a bigger area of 50 sq.km km of forest. Once it is declared as a wild life sanctuary, it will be a big tourist attraction of this district along with Ranipuram hill station and ecotourism. Declaring it as a sanctuary is the only way to protect this highly biodiversity area of kasaragod district.Illigal hunting of wild animal take place in the night and country liquior are made deep in the jungle."

"Kannur DFO and kanhangad Forest range officer should give immediate attention to declare it as a wild life sanctuary and deploy more forest guards. The proposed Munnam kadavu Dam may very useful to make a crocodile farm and afforestation around the dam resevoir will help to reindroduce the elephants and other wild animal sorrounding the proposed Ranipuram willd life sanctuary."
--User:Brenont (talk) 00:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)