Talk:Raegan Revord

Requested move 19 December 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved And I'm going to immediately nominate it for AfD, since the topic's notability has been challenged * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:42, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

---

Raegan Revord (Actress) → Raegan Revord – As far as I can tell, at the time of this writing, Wikipedia does not have any other articles called Raegan Revord. If there (at least at the time of this writing) is no other article called Raegan Revord, why disambiguate this article's title as Raegan Revord (Actress) instead of just naming it Raegan Revord? Heart of Destruction (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

• It is because Raegan Revord is indefinitely fully protected from creation due to repeated recreations. It's been awhile so hopefully someone with more knowledge about its history can decide if it should be G4'd or similar. Skynxnex (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  See Draft:Raegan Revord. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Ping @AngusWOOF if you wish to comment. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  I'll also ping @Anuwrites and @AlphaBetaGamma based on the AFC history for this version. Skynxnex (talk) 19:58, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Err... To be fair the sources on the current page are all published after the AfD succeeded. A quick read of the archive informs me that the repeatedly recreated former version had WP:GNG and WP:TOOSOON issues. Given that the subject was younger in 2020 (at the time of the AfD), I guess that had to happen. If I had the time I could take a look at all the sources to see if they repeat the same issue here, but I don't. RM should be made as long as it doesn't get g4'd, but I can't support or oppose the G4 here. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 23:52, 19 December 2024 (UTC)

  Sure; I just find this run-around the salting with a new draft at a carefully name that's different than the long-time declined draft mentioned by Gråbergs Gråa Sång by a so far SPA is a bit concerning, itself. But I agree it's probably out of scope for a RM. Skynxnex (talk) 03:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nomination. Since the main title header without parenthetical qualifier is a redlink, this is an uncontroversial technical request. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 23:55, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support as per reasons that have been already stated, including those by AlphaBetaGamma. Ira Leviton (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
• Support since (Actress) with a capital A is incorrect disambiguation. Theparties (talk) 05:17, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Support as this page's reviewer at AFC, I had made horrible mistake which I resolved here as asked by @Skynxnex. I would still appreciate if the page is moved to Raegan Revord when the name is unprotected to avoid such disambiguation. ANU^writes 16:04, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete / Back to draft Is she notable now? I still don't see any major roles since Young Sheldon. It looks like it was game-created to bypass the salt, so I would throw it back to draft where it belongs. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:24, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Anuwrites, can you show us the WP:THREE reliable sources that cover her bio? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:28, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for asking @AngusWOOF, I think being notable was never the issue, to say is she notable now? WP:TOOSOON was the main reason for initial denial if I'm not mistaken. As for WP:THREE that cover her bio, I see she passes WP:BASIC (atleast 4 reliable and independent to the subject references) and WP:NACTOR (role in major films, which she undoubtedly passes), she too got no bio written in the article to cite any reliable sources for the bio (just a birthdate which is cited in references). Do you still think it should be deleted? ANU^writes 20:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

"Significant roles" per your link. Which are the 4 reliable and Independent WP:GNG-good sources you see in the current article? People is mostly quotes, so is EW. Doesn't make them useless as sources, but not good from the WP:N perspective. WP:BLP-goodness of looper/thetab etc not obvious.

Per the listed "decline" at Draft:Raegan Revord, WP:N has been an issue. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 21:01, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

• Speedy move without redirect per WP:RDAB. If not notable it needs deleting. Crouch, Swale (talk) 23:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Comment

People adding text to this WP:BLP on a WP:MINOR should be arsed to add inline citations. Good ones, actually supporting the content. The current version [1] is ick. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

 Fixed at the time of writing. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Replacement with Draft version

There seem to be support during the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raegan Revord (2nd nomination) discussion for deleting this version of the page and moving Draft:Raegan Revord here in its place, as that seems a fuller version and this doesn't seem to have substantial material that would need to be merged. Anyone object? (Or concur? Or other comment?) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 06:21, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Agree. Marbe166 (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

@NatGertler Seems that the time is now, afd was closed as keep. This article should be swapped with the draft (started in 2018!), and the edit histories of draft/draft talk should be preserved, note current sucky-ness of this BLP as written compared to Draft:Raegan Revord. Can you do it, do we need an admin, or even an rfc? Ping to @AngusWOOF and @PrimeHunter if you have an opinion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:25, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I have moved Raegan Revord back to its original title Draft:Raegan Revord (Actress), moved the better and older version Draft:Raegan Revord to Raegan Revord, and redirected Draft:Raegan Revord (Actress) to it. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! So Draft talk:Raegan Revord will stay where it is? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:21, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I kept it there because this talk page already exists with significant content and Draft talk:Raegan Revord is mostly about whether it should be an article which is now moot. Others are free to merge if they think it would benefit this article. PrimeHunter (talk) 11:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Fair enough. I consider [2] to be more relevant, and you fixed that. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:52, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I added a notice up top to give editors a chance of finding older discussions, though I guess discussions posted 2018-2020 are irretrievably lost. I agree there's not much point to bringing those discussions over here, as long as nobody (again) deletes the talk page history of the draft. As long as Draft:Raegan Revord redirects into mainspace, the talk page history should be safe from deletion, right? CapnZapp (talk) 13:10, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

FINALLY!

At last the cast section of the Young Sheldon article doesn't have one of its main female cast members as the only red link (or worse, no link at all)! It was a struggle over several years, before Wikipedia saw common sense here, but we got there in the end! I guess 2025 won't be all bad after all... CapnZapp (talk) 18:50, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

Picture of Raegan Revord

In case Raegan Revord or someone who knows her sees this, please consider contributing a picture of her per Wikipedia:A picture of you. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC)