Talk:Rachael Wiseman

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Analytic / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) importance has been clearly asserted. In addition to the 4+ published works listed, this author's work has already been cited on multiple other wikipedia articles. Take it to AfD if you think the subject lacks notability. Proposing speedy deletion for lack of asserted importance seems tendentious. --Jaredscribe (talk) 02:56, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

How has importance been clearly asserted? Which multiple Wikipedia articles cite her work? I do see G. E. M. Anscombe. Jay

05:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

There's clearly no claim of notability in the article as it stands. It will remain in draft space until it passes review. Deb (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic