Talk:RS RocketShip

Conversions

The use of slashes for separating conversions has been discussed for years at the convert template talk page. In the context of numbers and units, slashes normally represent division; so what's 127 mm/5 in? It would be 1, right? What's 12 km/h/3.3 m/s/11 ft/s? The template used to use slashes within brackets for multiple conversions (e.g. knots to km/h & mph). It was agreed that this was unsatisfactory (even described as "asinine") and that they've got to go. These slash was replaced with the (more satisfactory but still imperfect) semicolon. However, this only affected multiple conversions within brackets; input and output units could still be separated by a slash using disp=slash, disp=s or disp=/. It was concluded that this was no more desirable than the slashes separating multiple conversions and mention of the option was removed from the doc page. There are relatively few pages using the slash option and I've yet to come across a single one where it's really warranted (this one included). The template is well overdue for a revamp and having three different ways of producing an undesirable result doesn't seem like a feature worth keeping. Slashes can still be inserted using disp=x in case you really do want them. Using "or" in infoboxes might not be perfect, it may even be "terrible", but slashes aren't the answer in my view. Instead of a slash I'd rather see a comma or even a semicolon (for consistency with those in the multiple conversions already in the infobox). JIMp _talk·cont 04:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on MV Delta Mariner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071018092741/http://www.sbcapcd.org/eng/dl/other/dap10846-02.pdf to http://www.sbcapcd.org/eng/dl/other/dap10846-02.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201043125/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2001/q3/nr_010806i.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2001/q3/nr_010806i.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140908225242/http://www.afspc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123279962 to http://www.afspc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123279962
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111106180041/http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2001/q3/nr_010807h.html to http://www.boeing.com/news/releases/2001/q3/nr_010807h.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120201053316/http://www.newschannel5.com/story/16624267/new-details-emerge-about-bridge-collapse to http://www.newschannel5.com/story/16624267/new-details-emerge-about-bridge-collapse

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 11 January 2018 (UTC)