Talk:Queensland Council of Unions

Australia: Queensland / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Queensland Council of Unions is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

We already have a list of affiliate organisations so we don't need a list of external links to those organisations. The list of affiliates does little to inform the reader about the QCU so its inclusion is marginal at best while the external links are not appropriate. I've already removed them once however User:Robertwhyteus has reverted without discussion. Other opinions? - Shiftchange (talk) 10:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Sorry I didn't realise you had deleted the external links. I thought I had mis-saved the file. Email notification of talk adds and changes to watched pages hasn't worked for me for a couple of years, I don't know why. So I rely on seeing the menu bar alert which I sometimes don't notice. Robertwhyteus (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

A peak body is nothing if not a coordinating organisations for its affiliates, so I would have the list of affiliates is the basic factual information necessary in a page about them, but maybe I am missing something. You say it is marginal at best? Anyway you have left them, so I guess that's not in question.
External links I would have thought are useful in taking people to the source of content for those affiliated organisations, but is your reasoning the web sites, being owned by those organisations, are not editable like Wikipedia therefore not balanced or encyclopaedic, therefore having no place on a wiki page? I understand this could be true and if its policy not to have such links, fair enough. Some don't have wiki pages though so someone wanting to more might find them useful. I suppose they could just ask Lord Google.
Whatever you think is a fair thing, and I'll try to keep an eye on the page manually, to see what you decide. Robertwhyteus (talk) 20:37, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Influence or Achievements section

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think the article lacks some critical review of its power and influence. Chapter 6, 'The Industrial and Political Role of the Trades and Labour Council of Queensland since 1922: A Reassessment' in Peak Unions in Australia: Origins, Purpose, Power, Agency discusses the union's lack of majority representation and suggests it has been the lest effective state scale union councils in Australia. I've got the some reading to do before I add content and citations from the source as it appears to be useful. - Shiftchange (talk) 22:18, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

sounds good to me. ;-p Robertwhyteus (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queensland Council of Unions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic