Talk:Quartz monzonite

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

History of Rocks

edit

Rocks are awsome things that tell us about history. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.184.243 (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Granite? Or Not?

edit

At the moment, the article claims both that Quartz monzonite is a kinds of granite and that it isn't. Any qualified geologist want to weigh in on the question? 206.208.105.129 (talk) 18:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reworded a bit. It isn't a granite, but can be termed a granitic rock - as a coarse grained light colored felsic rock field term. Vsmith (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! 206.208.105.129 (talk) 14:57, 20 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Quartz monzonite. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply