Talk:Qarabagh District, Kabul
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Qarabagh District, Kabul article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Comment
editThe map linked here is Qarabagh in Ghazni Province, different from the Qarabagh near Kabul described in the entry.
- Fixed. Thanks for the heads up. --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 17:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Need for References
editWouldn't you think it best to actually cite the sources in the article rather than depend on the external links alone? Please see WP:CITE especially paragraph 3.6. Of course, it is a guideline, not a policy. JBEvans 15:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
ethnic compositions
editAs of 2002 around 60% of the population were Tajiks and 40% Pashtuns
- 60% of population is not tajiks by etnic orientation , they are ethnicali qizilbash-turkic peoples (dari speaking population)--Asparux Xan Bulqar (talk) 13:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Qarabagh District, Kabul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070929101937/http://www.aims.org.af/maps/district/kabul/qarabagh.pdf to http://www.aims.org.af/maps/district/kabul/qarabagh.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)