Talk:Pygmy music
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editSources are not updated and these music websites don't have adequate information on Pygmy music. They have little to no context or historical background on this type of music which is vital to understanding how this interesting type of music came about. The "World Music Central" citation is virtually useless and unrelated to the topic at hand. The topic of "Liquinid"i can not be found in the sources that were cited. There is only one subtitle that is adequate and has an abundance of information and only one citation that is partially useful and applicable to the topic. In conclusion, this article is vague and needs further context, information and better sources. Information that touched more on the singers of this genre of music would be useful and would significantly improve the quality of this article. ValerieGudino (talk) 22:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pygmy music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050206121222/http://citypaper.net/articles/061396/article001.shtml to http://citypaper.net/articles/061396/article001.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)