Talk:Purulent pericarditis
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Skippy0206 in topic Peer Review
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Peer Review
editCoverage
- The content of the article is comprehensive, especially considering the article was made from scratch
Article body
- The page structure is similar to the established pericarditis page, and the body is divided into relevant logical sections that follow guidelines for the topic. Information is presented in a neutral tone.
Images
- Images are included and appropriate for the subject
References
- Sources are from reputable journals, and information is cited appropriately
Overall impression
- Great job overall! You can tell a lot of hard work was put into this page.
Further Suggestions
- Information regarding chronic constrictive pericarditis as a long term complication could be added
- Specific bacterial and fungal causes could be included
- The symptom section could be formatted in bullet points, similar to the pericarditis page