Talk:Puncheon Run Connector/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- What is a surface intersection?
- Reworded. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- "development" - either be more specific, or remove it entirely.
- Clarified. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- What does DelDOT stand for?
- Defined abbreviation. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- What about the city of Dover not liking the proposal? That seems significant, doesn't it?
- Not a requirement for GA, but the picture is a bit dark.
On hold. --Rschen7754 05:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, I have replied to the above comments. Dough4872 19:01, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- Passing. --Rschen7754 20:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)