Talk:Psephophorus

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Audioboss in topic Images of species for this genus

Comments

edit

DYK hook

edit

The DYK hook that this talk page mentions is about "that the extinct sea turtle Psephophorus was once mistaken as an ancient armadillo due to the specimen's poor condition?" Where is this from? Why was it deleted from the article? I suppose it's just trivia. --Blechnic (talk) 01:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


New source reference

edit

species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus terrypratchetti. (1995)

A new species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus (Order Testudines) from the Eocene of the South Island, New Zealand. (named after Terry Pratchett)

Etymology: In honour of the British novelist Terry Pratchett, whose wonderful style and great sense of humour, combined with his deep affection for turtles, merits the naming of this new species after him.

http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/site/publish/journals/jrsnz/1995/44.aspx

http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/includes/download.aspx?ID=85093

Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand abstracts


A new species of the fossil turtle Psephophorus (Order Testudines) from the Eocene of the South Island, New Zealand. R. Köhler * Until now the genus Psephophorus has been known only from Tertiary sediments in Europe, Egypt and the United States. Five specimens from mid Eocene sediments near Waimate (South Canterbury) and one specimen from near Dunedin (Otago) comprise the only such records for the Southern Hemisphere, and are also among the oldest records worldwide. The differences between the New Zealand material and described species of Psephophorus are justification for the naming of the new species, Psephophorus terrypratchetti. Keywords: Order Testudines, Family Dermochelyidae, Southern Hemisphere, New Zealand, Eocene.

(c) Journal of The Royal Society of New Zealand,

Volume 25, Number 3, September 1995, pp 371-384 --Ripvanwinkle111 164.156.231.55 (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Merge

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to Merge. NukeofEarl (talk) 17:17, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest the article on P. terrypratchetti be merged into this article in the species section. There is very little different between the two articles at this point.--Kevmin § 15:33, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Support merge. It is [[standard convention (although not mandatory) to merge extinct species stubs to the genus article unless or until the individual species have been developed enough to warrant a split. Stegosaurus, one of the most well-known fossil genera, easily accompanies all species in a single article.--Animalparty-- (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support. For reasons given above. Faendalimas talk 10:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Support Of course. FunkMonk (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Psephophorus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Images of species for this genus

edit

I have added an image of Psephophorus californiensis based on morphological descriptions from journals. Michael (talk) 20:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)Reply