Proverb (Reich) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I failed this not because it's a bad article, but because it's essentially a stub. A decent start, but not up to GA level. Amongst the criteria, it doesn't really adequately explain a number of the terms it uses (no short description of hocket? No overview of the "explanation" of Reich's career?), and it's not very broad - it keeps it short and simple when a lot more could probably be said, such as with the remixes and its place within Reich's other work. Keep going, though. While there's a ways to go, I think this could turn into a good article. --badlydrawnjefftalk01:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
I've added some information about the structure of the work. I've also removed the reference to hocket as it is inaccurate; the homage is to organum. I did a final year dissertation on this at university, so I might add more later. Daniel Rollison (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
