Talk:Promastax

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / The 10,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article was created or improved during The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada, which started in November 2016 and is ongoing. You can help!!

A fact from Promastax appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that at one point the fossil grasshopper Promastax was placed in the same family as a stick insect?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Promastax.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 18:13, 6 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

1910 Illustration of the Promastax archaicus fossil

... that Promastax (pictured) was collected in 1906, described in 1910, and given its own family in 1981? Source: 1906 & 1910 (Handlirsch, 1910) 1981 (Kevan & Wighton)
- ALT1: ... that at one point the fossil grasshopper Promastax (pictured) was placed in the same family as a stick insect? Source: Kevan & Wighton (1981) and Nel & Delfosse (2011) respectively for the taxonomic affinities of Promastacoides
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Melibe colemani

Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 14:34, 12 May 2022 (UTC).Reply

Moved to mainspace on 12 May. The article is long enough at 6906 characters of readable prose. It is neutral, uses reliable sources and has inline citations throughout. Both hooks are correctly formatted; I prefer Alt1 but either is fine. The citations are offline so will AGF accuracy and copyvio issues. QPQ done. -Ykraps (talk) 07:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic