Talk:Proceedings of SPIE
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tom.Reding in topic Please confirm classification
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
The journal (or even proceeding) should be mentioned with a stub, not only with a link
editIn the most of cases, the reader look for a paper, not for SPIE. The shorter is chain of links, the better. dima 04:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
Please confirm classification
editThe WikiProject classification for Proceedings of SPIE is Start-class. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 18:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Stub. @Tom.Reding:. If you think it looks like a stub (see WP:JWG), just update the talk page, or just leave a message on the talk page. Removing the stub template + leaving a talk page message for others to re-add the stub template and update the talk page templates is tedious. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 18:55, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Headbomb: I will do that for the most obvious cases (like this one). ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:43, 11 July 2016 (UTC)