Talk:Procedural knowledge

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Someone should add something on "knobology". The previous unsigned comment was added by 128.135.229.224 at 00:11, 19 September 2005‎ (UTC)Reply

I really don't like the VB example. Algorithms and VB programs are both procedural knowledge, even if the former is more general. So this example acutally does not truely show the weakness of procedural knowledge. The previous unsigned comment was added by 69.162.58.56 at 04:34, 6 August 2006‎ (UTC)Reply

(I didn't write the sentence above and don't know who did) It seems to me that the VB example is bad because it tries to explain something in terms of variety in programming languages - not a particularly accessible illustration. Will the lay person know what a Microsoft job-shop is and why it is to be expected that a VB programmer's skills will only be useful there? 82.13.83.244 01:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 March 2020 and 6 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MaryLaFlamme64.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic