Talk:Prince Ludwig Rudolf of Hanover

Caution: wrong statements on main page

Due to the Wikipedia three-revert rule correction of factual wrong statements on this topic are not always possible. In particular claims that Ludwig Rudolph Prinz von Hannover is a prince are provable wrong but repeatedly introduced into the main article. There are no Princes of Hanover since 1919. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clumpytree (talk • contribs) 16:43, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

And what was this man's families legal name, as this is still unsupported in their articles? - dwc lr (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Presumably his legal family name is "Prinz von Hannover", but as I said before I do not know for sure, and I do not think the information is publicly available. I do not object discussing his name and how different people call him in the article. All I try to correct is false claims that he is a prince. Clumpytree (talk) 17:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring

Due to heavy edit warring I protected the page. Please discuss content here. After you come to a consensus, I (or any other administrator) can unprotect the page. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Requested move 25 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Bobby Cohn (talk) 15:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

---

Ludwig Rudolph von Hannover → Prince Ludwig Rudolf of Hanover – I was unable to find any reliable English-language sources using the current article title, which I found surprising given the manner of his death. Sources commonly use the proposed target.[1][2][3][4] Articles should be at recognizable English-language common names per policy and guidelines. DrKay (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Prefer Prince Ludwig Rudolph von Hannover as a better title 173.72.3.91 (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Support per nom. Keivan.f^Talk 05:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Support per nom, his English common name. Walco1 (talk) 20:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Support: per nom. Even the Der Spiegel article reporting his death refers to the article subject and his wife as prince and princess respectively. --StellarHalo (talk) 00:34, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

• Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:57, 1 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.