Talk:Portugal–Serbia relations
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Portugal–Serbia relations article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section on Kosovo
editI'm moving to Kosovan–Portuguese relations. LibStar (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I have added back a couple of notes. Portugal's involvement in the (then) Province of Kosovo preceded the Kosovo declaration of independence from Serbia and is clearly relevant to their relationship with Serbia. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Kingdom of Yugoslavia
editThere is an anomaly here. http://www.mfa.gov.rs/Policy/Bilaterala/Portugal/basic_e.html says that relations with Portugal were interrupted in 1920. I can't see any reason for that, think I saw a source mentioning a Portuguese mission in 1928 that I forgot to note, and found a source that seems to say Portugal recognized the Yugoslav government in exile after 1941, which I added. Is this an error on the MFA website? Aymatth2 (talk) 18:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Error or something?
editThe Economic section say that "In the January-October 2006 period exports from Serbia to Portugal were US$7.3 million while exports to Portugal were worth US$5.4 million.", Shouldn't it be from Portugal? I would have just changed it, but the source says it the same way. As it reads now it says gives two different numbers fro exports to Portugal and none for the other way around. Spiesr (talk) 21:46, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Good catch. I changed the text to add the two numbers together, maybe more accurate. Usually government sources like this are reasonably reliable, checked by many layers of bureaucracy, but this one seems sloppy. See previous section. Aymatth2 (talk) 23:53, 8 August 2009 (UTC)