Talk:Portage Park, Chicago

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Six Corners Merger

edit
The following discussion is a concluded merger debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was the nomination No consensus (1 for, 1 against).--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 21:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

If we can get six corners adequately cited it might stand on its own. Otherwise, it should probably be merged.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 16:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have never heard it called six corners, and the portage pk article is so short the merge would do it good. Speciate 02:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is a concluded merger debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

How

edit

large is the Polish comminuty? 80.43.228.2 (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Portage Park, Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply