Is the year of the Roman synode correct? The article says 499, but also makes it seem that this happened after the end of the schism in 505. Andre Engels
- The year is correct. I re-ordered the facts, so now it should be more clear.--Panairjdde 08:22, 3 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Could we get a citation on the supposed veneration of Symmachus by the Oriental Orthodox? This sounds like an astounding claim to me, as I would have thought them to probably think of Symmachus as a heretic. Deusveritasest (talk) 01:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Is there any relation to the gens Symmachi? I notice that one of its members, the consul Quintus Aurelius Memmius Symmachus, supported the Pope in the controversy. Was there a familial connection there, is it an amazing coincidence, or were these names more common in Rome at this time? --Akhenaten0 (talk) 15:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
- There were other Symmachuses, in several generations. The topic can be a prosopographical minefield. Consult the experts: Jones, Arnold Hugh Martin; Martindale, John Robert (1980). The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire: A.D. 395-527. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. --Vicedomino (talk) 22:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Reply